[Cg1] Re: Replacing Mersenne Twister

Stefan Lemme lemme at cg.uni-saarland.de
Thu Dec 20 11:26:02 CET 2018


that's fine as long as you keep the interface and the implementation 
remains self-contained.


On 12/20/2018 11:11 AM, s8makrus at stud.uni-saarland.de wrote:
> Hi!
> The Mersenne Twister Engine is known to be slow due it's huge internal state. Also, the pseudorandom numbers it produces are of poor quality.
> May we use a 'better' engine like the ones from the PCG family?
> Best regards,
> Matthis
> _______________________________________________
> Cg1 mailing list
> Cg1 at cg.uni-saarland.de
> http://mail.cg.uni-saarland.de/mailman/listinfo/cg1

More information about the Cg1 mailing list